[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/* |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:08:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Am 16.12.2016 um 17:38 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
> [2] Side Note: other proposed names for minimum-length so far:
>
> (1) minimum-space
> (2) show-length
> (3) hide-below-length
> (4) hide-if-shorter-than
> (5) minimum-visibility
> (6) visibility-threshold
> (7) printing-threshold
> (8) extender-threshold
At a first glance, the property is still the same, just the behaviour
for shorter extenders changed:
before: shorter extenders are prolonged
after: shorter extenders are not visible
But at a second glance, the minimum-length for LilyPond grobs usually
means that the object is visible and the length is at least
minimum-length (for glissandi, etc.). Using it to hide a shorter object
feels inconsistent, IMHO. So I agree with Werner. But I have no
favourite naming, all of them sound wrong to me - a slight preference
for (6).
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, (continued)
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Paul, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Abraham Lee, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, tisimst, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/22
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Dan Eble, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/18
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*,
Noeck <=
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Trevor Daniels, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Noeck, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Urs Liska, 2016/12/14
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, David Nalesnik, 2016/12/14