[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSoC project ideas

From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: GSoC project ideas
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:28:54 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0

Am 23.01.2017 um 23:11 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 23.01.2017 22:47, Urs Liska wrote:
>> So while it's perfectly possible to put OLL projects on the list and to
>> apply for them (or others not listed there) in case of doubt projects
>> working on LilyPond itself might be the preference of the developer
>> community.
> […]
>> What I would see as a better project (and what I intend to suggest for
>> the list) is developing a system of automated testing and documentation
>> generation for openLilyLib, both the snippets repo and the other,
>> "new-style", packages. This would actually bring openLilyLib a huge step
>> forward to be usable on a broader base.
> I think having openlilylib in a state where it’s reliable, easy to use
> and gets adopted more generally would be a huge step forward for all
> of LilyPond. I’m thinking (as I’m certain you are, too) of something
> comparable to the package system of the TeX universe, which offers a
> great possibility to provide facilities for very different use cases
> without blowing up the core program, while still having them readily
> available, documented and comfortable to maintain.
> So don’t be too uneasy about bringing openLilyLib up here, I think.

Thanks for that.
I've uploaded a patch at


> Best, Simon
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]