Re: Website upload

[Urs Liska]

Am 07.03.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> Sorry for top post - as you see my email client doesn't properly
> indent your reply.
>
> Anyway, I've now done the following command:
>
> rsync -n -aO -d --no-r --delete -i $BUILD/out-website/website/
> $DEST/website/ &>rs.txt
>
> Which gives the output in the attached file.  I guess this means it
> would only delete the filenames preceded by "*deleting" - 

Looks like it.

> I assume the other files named are just for information?

No, it states what it would do with them, i.e. probably uploading (or
maybe it also states equality, I don't know).

So probably it should be safe to do the same *without* the -n option,
but probably *after* doing a backup, just in case.
And *after* someone else has confirmed that too.

Then we should probably have a redirect, if that's possible for all
http://lilypond.org/gsoc.* URLs pointing to the English version of
google-summer-of-code.html until April 3.

Urs

>
> -- 
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Website upload
>
>
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
>> To: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>
>> Cc: <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 11:31 AM
>> Subject: Re: Website upload
>>
>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>
>>> To: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
>>> Cc: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 11:08 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Website upload
>>>
>>>
>>>> Maybe someone with privileges on the server could manually run rsync
>>>> with the --delete and the -n (dry run) option and presenting us
>>>> with the
>>>> list of files that would be deleted remotely. Probably this would
>>>> quickly tell us if we have legitimate "orphaned" files.
>>>>
>>>> Urs
>>>
>>>
>>> That sounds like a good plan.  AFAICS I would need to run the line
>>> from make-website.sh, but with those added options:
>>>
>>> rsync -raO -n --delete $BUILD/out-website/website/ $DEST/website/
>>>
>>> ??
>>
>>
>> Hmm.  Tried that.  No output.
>
> -n, --dry-run
> This makes rsync perform a  trial run that doesn’t make
> any changes (and  produces mostly the same  output as a
> real  run).  It  is most  commonly used  in combination
> with  the -v,  --verbose  and/or -i,  --itemize-changes
> options to  see what  an rsync command  is going  to do
> before one actually runs it.
>
> The  output  of  --itemize-changes is  supposed  to  be
> exactly the same on a dry run and a subsequent real run
> (barring   intentional   trickery   and   system   call
> failures);  if it  isn’t, that’s  a bug.   Other output
> should  be mostly  unchanged,  but may  differ in  some
> areas.  Notably,  a dry  run does  not send  the actual
> data for  file transfers, so --progress  has no effect,
> the  bytes  sent,  bytes received,  literal  data,  and
> matched data statistics are  too small, and the speedup
> value is  equivalent to a  run where no  file transfers
> were needed.
>
> Maybe add -i to the options?
>
> How did you catch the output?  On a terminal or via redirection?  Maybe
> you need to redirect stderr as well?
>

-- 
address@hidden
https://openlilylib.org
http://lilypondblog.org