Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?

[Jean-Charles Malahieude]

Le 19/07/2017 à 14:48, David Kastrup a écrit :
> Federico Bruni writes:
>
> > Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> >
> > > Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and
> > > their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk",
> > > it would make sense to only translate stuff in the stable 2.20
> > > branch in the interregnum: that way the translation branch can be
> > > merged (rather than individual parts cherry-picked) into the stable
> > > branch until the stable branch gets released.
> >
> > So when you create the stable/2.20 branch, Jean-Charles or Paco will
> > merge that branch (instead of master) into the translation branch; and
> > translators will keep working on the translation branch as usual.
> >
> > Is it correct?
>
> Yes, I think this is what should make sense.  I'll do so today.

I've included Walter's patch into translation and now stable/2.20 and 
translation are similar.

So, until next 2.21 is out, the translators' Mary-go-round is just 
between the stable/2.20 and translation branch.

Cheers,
Jean-Charles