[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: inchord repeatTie

From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: inchord repeatTie
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 17:41:18 +0200

2017-10-21 14:04 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
> 2017-10-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Hi,
>>> on user it's complained that repeatTie is not printed in chord. Most recent:
>>> Because I don't know C++ I simply tested to copy all from
>>> into, renaming
>>> all ofcourse.
>>> I have a successful build.
>>> The example works:
>>> {
>>>     <
>>>      c'\laissezVibrer
>>>      e'
>>>      g'^\repeatTie
>>>     >
>>> }
>>> Right now I wait for make check finishing.
>>> Have to leave soon, results probably in the evening, though.
>>> Could it be that easy??
>> Well, it's usually not all that much harder than that, but I'd expect a
>> few spots to require changes in order to make up for more fundamental
>> differences.  Note that the Rhythmic_event_iterator will check for stuff
>> like { g'\repeatTie } whether there is an engraver listening before
>> deciding whether to leave the event to the discretion of the likes of
>> "New_fingering_engraver" and keep it on the g' or whether to strip it
>> off and announce it separately to engravers.
>> So there may be other side effects _outside_ of chords by adding such an
>> engraver.
>> --
>> David Kastrup
> Apart from regtest I've now a clean make check.
> Though, in the light of your remarks I'll do some more tests before
> even thinking of providing a patch...
> Cheers,
>   Harm

Ok, further testing didn't show anything fishy, so I'll go for a patch.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]