[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rational

From: Hans Åberg
Subject: Re: Rational
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 18:22:12 +0200

> On 23 May 2018, at 18:12, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>> I ended up using GC_malloc_uncollectable, because it turned out too
>> tricky to use malloc.
> This is C++, so we basically end up with operator ::new and operator
> ::delete unless overriden by individual classes.  They use

This what they suggest for the Boehm GC, and it is what caused problems in my 

> ...the
> equivalent of GC_malloc_uncollectable.

So what exactly is this in the Boehm GC?

>> And I found no reference to it in LilyPond, so I got curious about how
>> you do it. But you are not going to tell me, so forget about it.
> You know, if you actually bothered _asking_, you'd increase your chances
> of getting an answer.

Typically when the item is brought up people would say "Yes, we use this or 
that", rather than long bodies of text with no such information.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]