[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microrhythm
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Microrhythm |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2018 18:21:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.d.0.180513 |
On 5/26/18, 10:44 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
<address@hidden on behalf of address@hidden> wrote:
Entirely subjective which hill is worth dying on: Güllich was the first
to extensively exposed hard "solo" routes, with the final climb being
without protection where a missed or broken-out hold would have been
deadly. Nobody thought he'd live to old age, but nobody imagined he'll
die falling asleep behind the wheel.
I believe the English idiom about dying on a hill makes reference not to dying
on a climb, but rather to warfare, where one would die trying to protect high
ground that has strategic importance in the battle. A 1.5 meter high hill
virtually never has strategic importance; hence it's not worth dying on.
Carl
- Re: Rational, (continued)
- Re: Microrhythm, Hans Åberg, 2018/05/22
- Re: Microrhythm, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2018/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: Microrhythm, metachromatic, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, Hans Åberg, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, Hans Åberg, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, Kieren MacMillan, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, David Kastrup, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Microrhythm, David Kastrup, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, Arthur Reutenauer, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, David Kastrup, 2018/05/26
- Re: Microrhythm, Colin Campbell, 2018/05/26