[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: GUB |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:41:09 +0200 |
2018-07-09 23:33 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> In May, when we were discussing the limitations of 32 bit MinGW, I asked Jan
> for an estimate of how much work it would be to add a 64-bt MinGW to GUB.
>
> His answer was that GUB is a hack, and that he wasn't interested in putting
> any more effort into fixing up GUB, although he would certainly provide me
> advice if I asked for it.
>
> His recommendation was to move to Guix[1], which is an existing and
> supporting package for maintaining appropriate package versions for a
> particular user. He said he would be willing to help with that, as it's
> making things better, not just spending more effort on a hack.
>
> Are there any opinions on whether we should pursue a move to Guix?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
>
> 1.
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Package-Management.html
>From a mail by Ludovic Courtès via the guile-user-list:
"The plan is for Guix to require Guile >= 2.2 sometime soon though,"
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2018-07/msg00043.html
So ...
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: GUB, (continued)
- Re: GUB, Karlin High, 2018/07/11
- Re: GUB, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/07/13
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/13
- Re: GUB, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/07/13
- Re: GUB, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/13
- Re: GUB, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/07/14
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/14
- Re: GUB, Karlin High, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB, Karlin High, 2018/07/10
- Re: GUB,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: GUB, David Kastrup, 2018/07/13
- Re: GUB, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/07/13