[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:51:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.e.1.180613 |
On 7/15/18, 3:29 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup"
<address@hidden on behalf of address@hidden> wrote:
Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just noticed that it’s possible to use the LilyPond symbol list/key
> list syntax when setting melismaBusyProperties. However, the doc
> string reads
>
> "A list of properties (symbols) to determine whether a melisma is playing.
> Setting this property will influence how lyrics are aligned to notes.
> For example, if set to @code{'(melismaBusy beamMelismaBusy)},
> only manual melismata and manual beams are considered.
> Possible values include @code{melismaBusy}, @code{slurMelismaBusy},
> @code{tieMelismaBusy}, and @code{beamMelismaBusy}."
>
> Would we want to change the first code example to
>
> @code{melismaBusy,beamMelismaBusy}
>
> or otherwise suggest the new syntax?
Feel free to do so, I think. It's not really a change of syntax
specifically for melismaBusyProperties so I'd likely not mess with the
descriptions when they talk about "symbol list" or whatever. Instead
I'd just change the examples.
I don't think we should change the doc string. IIUC, the property actually is
a list. But we can set it using LilyPond syntax, as well as Scheme syntax. So
I agree that it should shown in the examples, but the docstring should not be
changed.
Thanks,
Carl
- melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Simon Albrecht, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Simon Albrecht, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/16
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/16
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/16
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/16