[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: compilation with clang

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: compilation with clang
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 11:22:20 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>> And answers are trickling in; see thread starting with
>> Is the work-around shown in
>> usable for lilypond?
> No.  It's not C++08 syntax, and LilyPond actually makes use of the
> overloading resolution (which of the templates is called depends on
> where in the hierarchy the function that the function pointer refers to
> is defined) as part of the macro framework used here and thus it's not
> possible to manually resolve the override and kill all the prospective
> alternatives.

Besides, the way I read the "work-around" output, it still fails in

> If the Clang developers refuse to fix the bug, we'll just stick with the
> current scheme: we don't need Clang to compile the MacOSX version of
> LilyPond.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]