[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUB lilypond build fails

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: GUB lilypond build fails
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:48:55 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
>> To: "Werner LEMBERG" <address@hidden>
>> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 12:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: GUB lilypond build fails
>>> The problem with "NewGub" would seem to be my issue.  I've always
>>> made and uploaded GUB in a VM with a user gub and a directory called
>>> NewGub under that user's home directory.  I'm currently trying to
>>> build from a user with a home directory called gubd and in a
>>> directory called GubDir.  I do have a user called gub (it's where
>>> the VM lives) and could create a directory called NewGub and try to
>>> see if this works at this time.  Watch this space.
>> Success building from master. Thanks Werner.  Will take me a time to
>> sort out a build from the stable candidate, but it looks like we're on
>> track.
>> make lilypond took 4 hours on a core i7 with 4 core, 8 hyperthreads...
> That does not say a lot without specifying the generation.  I have in my
> laptop a
> model name    : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2630QM CPU @ 2.00GHz
> which would formally meet this specification (I think it's pretty much
> the lowest possible mobile CPU that would).  Admittedly, the laptop is
> not certified for the CPU's thermal design power and it's just since
> last year or so since I caved and upgraded, but still it's considered
> slow in comparison to today's usual horsepower.

Over the CPU bragging I forgot the most important part of this

YES!!!!  Finally progress again.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]