[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

From: Jacques Menu
Subject: Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 19:34:53 +0100

> Le 8 mars 2019 à 19:14, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>> On 8 Mar 2019, at 15:42, Karlin High <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 3/8/2019 8:31 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>>> So, my vote would be to try to do a Darwin-only version of Lilypond, and 
>>> position Frescobaldi as the "default editor" for Mac users.
>> Would MacPorts installation be adequate for LilyPond? Hans Åberg reports 
>> success with this. Or is it important to have something available from 
> I would be good if more people try the MacPorts installation.
> The lilypond-devel version lists gcc8 as a library dependency, so that speaks 
> for it, rather than trying to use XCode clang, which is not the real one, but 
> an Apple inhouse version of unknown relation to the real one, and I recall 
> you had some problems with getting it to compile with clang. The one you use 
> now I think is gcc4.2, which is the last real gcc that Apple had, in later 
> versions, this name defaults to clang.
> I think too that it might be better to switch to say Frescobaldi as the 
> official LilyPond editor if you need one, though I haven't used it. Their 
> site is only in Dutch from what I could see, which might be a turnoff.

The English version link at the bottom left leads to a 404.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]