[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?)

From: Dan Eble
Subject: Re: Python 3 (was: 2.20 where are we?)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:47:37 -0400

On Sep 27, 2019, at 16:34, Matthew Peveler <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'll have another email later on with patches for having this branch run
> under both python2.7 & 3 as the necessary backport efforts were not really
> all that extravagant with just a handful of shims around the changes you
> noted in long vs int, unicode vs str, StringIO vs io, vs
> iter.__next__, reload, xrange vs range.

Are these complications desirable?  A clean and obvious implementation 
requiring Python 3 will be easier to maintain.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]