[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilyglyphs: Python 2 deprecation

From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: lilyglyphs: Python 2 deprecation
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:47:12 +0100
User-agent: K-9 Mail for Android

Am 12. November 2019 10:50:45 MEZ schrieb David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> This package is written by Urs Liska <address@hidden>, who is
>>>> quite busy these days.  In case you have experience with Python 2
>>>> to 3 conversion, please help produce a new version!
>>> Should it still be backwards compatible with Python 2.7 if possible
>>> is it ok to drop Python2 backwards compatibility completely? Option
>>> one is possible, option two gives cleaner code, and is easier to
>>> maintain in future.
>> I favour option one.  Inspite of the announced `death' of Python 2
>> quite sure that this version series will stay for many years.

I wouldn't see the need for backwatd compatibility, but I must admit I haven't 
thought about the issue too much.

>With regard to GUB, 2.7 compatibility makes for a much nicer transition
>period.  But GUB is not likely involved in uses of that package

Correct, lilyglyphs doesn't play any role in creating or building LilyPond. 


> which
>seems to be mainly used in a TeXlive context.  I haven't checked, but I
>think that TeXlive is pretty much prepared to use Python3.

Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]