[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Yaffut

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Yaffut
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:12:34 +0100

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> > What level of respect should I maintain for the integrity of
> > flower/include/yaffut.h?  I think it would be nice to limit the
> > default output of the unit test program to errors + summary, and I
> > could achieve that either by modifying Yaffut itself or by filtering
> > the output through a script.

Go wild. There are only 2 (?) small flower lib files that have tests,
so I don't think this merits much attention.

> My personal opinion for the amount of respect is: none.  I didn't even
> know it had an existence outside of LilyPond
> (<> shows dead links and a
> Boost licence but it would be my guess that Han-Wen and Jan have
> properly handled this at the time the code was pulled into LilyPond and
> it would be my guess that its author may be the "Ruth" in LilyPond's

I am sure Ruth had nothing to do with Yaffut.

> At any rate, it should meet our needs.  In a similar vein, there seems
> no ongoing point in maintaining "flower" outside of what we need for
> LilyPond.


Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden -

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]