[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:12:34 +0100
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> > What level of respect should I maintain for the integrity of
> > flower/include/yaffut.h? I think it would be nice to limit the
> > default output of the unit test program to errors + summary, and I
> > could achieve that either by modifying Yaffut itself or by filtering
> > the output through a script.
Go wild. There are only 2 (?) small flower lib files that have tests,
so I don't think this merits much attention.
> My personal opinion for the amount of respect is: none. I didn't even
> know it had an existence outside of LilyPond
> (<http://members.home.nl/rutger.van.beusekom/> shows dead links and a
> Boost licence but it would be my guess that Han-Wen and Jan have
> properly handled this at the time the code was pulled into LilyPond and
> it would be my guess that its author may be the "Ruth" in LilyPond's
> DEDICATION file).
I am sure Ruth had nothing to do with Yaffut.
> At any rate, it should meet our needs. In a similar vein, there seems
> no ongoing point in maintaining "flower" outside of what we need for
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Yaffut, Dan Eble, 2019/11/26
- Re: Yaffut, David Kastrup, 2019/11/26
- Re: Yaffut,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=