[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Jan 2020 23:46:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Wols Lists <address@hidden> writes:
> On 05/01/20 17:22, Malte Meyn wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 05.01.20 um 18:11 schrieb Wols Lists:
>>> Anyways, I'll give you a little tip, and attach my "dynamics.ily" file.
>>> All my custom dynamics live in here, and I include it in any work that
>>> might need them. I'm *guessing* that it's very similar to the standard
>>> definitions that exist in lilypond, […]
>>
>> No, it isn’t. Your commands produce TextScripts, not DynamicTexts, so
>> they are not vertically aligned with other dynamics. This is how the
>> standard definitions look like:
>>
>> sfzp = #(make-dynamic-script "sfzp")
>>
> Okay. That's fine for things like sfzp, but I've got things like "piu
> f", "molto ff", and looking at it, it looks like piu and molto are in a
> different font. Iirc, the dynamics font is missing a bunch of
> characters, which could be why.
>
> So how would I get that effect? Just putting the whole in a
> make-dynamic-script is likely to result in a garbled mess.
Is it?
piu-f = #(make-dynamic-script #{ \markup { \normal-text \italic piu f } #})
{ c''1\piu-f }
> (Sorry I'm not trying it out right now, but I'm reading emails, not
> doing lilypond and looking for a piece to check it out on :-)
That's a problem if your mail client is not your LilyPond IDE.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, (continued)
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wols Lists, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Malte Meyn, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wols Lists, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Wol, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/05
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/06
- How to use LilyDev without systemd, Peter Toye, 2020/01/09
- Re: How to use LilyDev without systemd, Federico Bruni, 2020/01/09
- Re: How to use LilyDev without systemd, Peter Toye, 2020/01/09
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Dan Eble, 2020/01/04
- Re: A suggestion: add \rf to built-in dynamics, Peter Toye, 2020/01/04