[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automated formatting
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: automated formatting |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:05:59 -0500 |
On Jan 27, 2020, at 07:43, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Frankly, I just forgot about either. I think it would be a good idea to
> take up this practice again. Regarding Clang: unless Astyle falls apart
> using C++11 constructs that are going to occur more frequently in
> future, I think there is little reason to depart from its use instead of
> reverting to Clang.
I have learned not to fuss about the particulars of required style as long as I
have the following:
1. a simple way to exclude sections of code manually
2. a style check integrated into "make check"
3. a makefile target that automatically restyles all source so that "make
check" will pass. Only the files that need to be modified are touched. This
runs only when requested, never as a prerequisite of any other target.
—
Dan
- automated formatting, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting, David Kastrup, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting, David Kastrup, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: automated formatting, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting, David Kastrup, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting, David Kastrup, 2020/01/27
- Re: automated formatting, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/28
- Re: automated formatting, Carl Sorensen, 2020/01/28
- Re: automated formatting, Dan Eble, 2020/01/28
- Re: automated formatting, David Kastrup, 2020/01/28
- Re: automated formatting, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/01/30
- Re: automated formatting, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/01/30