Re: Staging broken.

[David Kastrup]

Lukas-Fabian Moser <address@hidden> writes:

> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 09:08, David Kastrup <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> Color me curious: why would you try building staging?  The whole point
>> of the staging system was to avoid breakage for developers.  Only patchy
>> processes are supposed to care about staging.
>>
>
> Master didn't compile, and I tried staging next. But I see now that this
> doesn't make much sense as staging is more likely to break.
>
> I don't remember what exactly kept Master from compiling yesterday - when I
> tried later it worked. But anyway, my stupid procedure enabled me to
> confirm that Staging broke with the same error that you encountered.
>
> By the way: does it make sense to compile and use the stable/2.20 branch
> for my everyday work (beta testing, so to speak)?

That would certainly make sense as long as it has what you need.

-- 
David Kastrup