lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Need help with guile 1.88 or using guile 2.2 with lilypond-2.20


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Need help with guile 1.88 or using guile 2.2 with lilypond-2.20
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:16:45 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Dave Plater <dplater.list@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi, I maintain Lilypond for openSUSE and also created guile1 for
> lilypond using guile-1.8.8
> I have a problem, guile-1.8.8 doesn't build with gcc 10:
> cat alist.doc arbiters.doc async.doc backtrace.doc boolean.doc
> chars.doc continuations.doc debug.doc deprecation.doc deprecated.doc
> discouraged.doc dynl.doc dynwind.doc environments.doc eq.doc error.doc
> eval.doc evalext.doc extensions.doc feature.doc fluids.doc fports.doc
> futures.doc gc.doc goops.doc gsubr.doc gc-mark.doc gc-segment.doc
> gc-malloc.doc gc-card.doc guardians.doc hash.doc hashtab.doc hooks.doc
> i18n.doc init.doc ioext.doc keywords.doc lang.doc list.doc load.doc
> macros.doc mallocs.doc modules.doc numbers.doc objects.doc objprop.doc
> options.doc pairs.doc ports.doc print.doc procprop.doc procs.doc
> properties.doc random.doc rdelim.doc read.doc root.doc rw.doc
> scmsigs.doc script.doc simpos.doc smob.doc sort.doc srcprop.doc
> stackchk.doc stacks.doc stime.doc strings.doc srfi-4.doc srfi-13.doc
> srfi-14.doc strorder.doc strports.doc struct.doc symbols.doc
> threads.doc throw.doc values.doc variable.doc vectors.doc version.doc
> vports.doc weaks.doc ramap.doc unif.doc dynl.doc filesys.doc posix.doc
> net_db.doc socket.doc regex-posix.doc |
> GUILE="/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/guile-1.8.8/pre-inst-guile"
> ../scripts/snarf-check-and-output-texi          >
> guile-procedures.texi || { rm guile-procedures.texi; false; }
>
> Causes a:
> 15388 Segmentation fault      |

Last time I checked, a successful Guile-1.8 build needed to use the
branch_release-1-8 branch from the Guile repository (which has a few
commits on top).  However, I don't know whether this will already help
with your GCC 10 problem: I don't remember anything related to that.  If
it doesn't, you might want to ask Thien-Thi Nguyen (who has made this
branch tip work so far) to take a look.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]