[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals' font
From: |
Paolo Prete |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals' font |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:50:23 +0200 |
This is *MUCH* better for *MANY* and *MANY* reasons, thanks.
The more I observe them, the more I find excellent adjustments.
They also save useful space.
The only glyph that I don't like is the fermata one. The dot is too small
and, therefore:
1) it does not differ well from the staccato glyph.
2) it does not bring enough attention of the reader to the glyph
Why are they not already included in Lilypond? It would be really bad to
have troubles with compatibility issues with such a beautiful work...
Best,
P
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 5:17 PM James Lowe <pkx166h@posteo.net> wrote:
> On 03/07/2020 13:48, Paolo Prete wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 1) Is there a GPL or open-source alternative for FETA fonts for
> accidentals
> > that can be used with Lilypond? (If so, is there an example of how to use
> > them)?
>
> https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/gonville/
>
>
> ?
>
> James
>
>
>
>
- Re: Accidentals' font, (continued)
- Re: Accidentals' font, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/07/08
- Re: Accidentals' font, Paolo Prete, 2020/07/08
- Re: Accidentals' font, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/07/09
- Re: Accidentals' font, Paolo Prete, 2020/07/09
- Re: Accidentals' font, Urs Liska, 2020/07/10
- Re: Accidentals' font, Jean-Julien Fleck, 2020/07/10
- Re: Accidentals' font, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/07/10
- Re: Accidentals' font, Urs Liska, 2020/07/10
- Re: Accidentals' font, Kieren MacMillan, 2020/07/04
Re: Accidentals' font, James Lowe, 2020/07/03
- Re: Accidentals' font,
Paolo Prete <=