[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: private ly:version?

From: Jean Abou Samra
Subject: Re: private ly:version?
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:40:44 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

Le 24/09/2020 à 16:05, Jan-Peter Voigt a écrit :
Hi all,

I now have a use case for ly:version? documented in

But the function is module-private in lily. The example on that page
does not compile and so doesn't any external file.

I can work around it with
#(define ly:version? (@@ (lily) ly:version?))

But I guess that is not intended?
I might change the define to define-public in 'scm/lily-library.scm'?



Naturally, patches are always welcome!

I'm not quite sure how to properly ensure a condition
is true in a regression test. Maybe just

#(if (not (ly:version? = (ly:version)))
   (ly:message "WARNING: ly:version? broken!"))


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]