[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ready for 2.21.80?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: ready for 2.21.80? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Oct 2020 14:31:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.1 |
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2020, 13:23 +0000 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> Looking at this now. I see that in the 2.22 branch VERSION numbers are
> stable 2.22.0 and devel will be 2.21.80. I've never really worked out how
> GUB decides to create a new stable version or a development version, but it's
> conceivable that it creates the highest numerical version. I'm wondering
> whether it would be good to have the stable version number fixed at 2.20.0
> until we're ready to release 2.22.0?
Not sure I can follow here, the current VERSION content is:
MAJOR_VERSION=2
MINOR_VERSION=21
PATCH_LEVEL=80
MY_PATCH_LEVEL=
VERSION_STABLE=2.20.0
VERSION_DEVEL=2.21.7
I think the normal release procedure should do here, ie bump
VERSION_DEVEL to 2.21.80. After the release, PATCH_LEVEL in stable/2.22
should be 81 and the bump of VERSION_DEVEL needs to be applied to
master. I agree that the stable version number should remain at 2.20.0
for the time being, in both stable/2.22 and master.
>
> On 29/10/2020 15:52, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2020, 14:42 +0100 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> > > As the title says. We still need to merge the PO translations (see
> > > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/476 ) and pick
> > > them to stable/2.22. If you speak one of the concerned languages that
> > > I've been hijacking the translation for (ca, eo, es, it, nl, sv),
> > > please consider giving it a short look. I'll also merge the translation
> > > branch to stable/2.22 before asking Phil for a release.
> > All items from my list are done (above + fixing the translated snippets
> > when building in-tree) and stable/2.22 looks good from what I can tell.
> > So, I think we're ready for a first release candidate.
> > Phil, if you have time, could you run a build on stable/2.22? I will
> > stop picking fixes into the branch to avoid any interference (commits
> > to translation can of course continue).
> >
> > Regards
> > Jonas
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, (continued)
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/26
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/26
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/29
Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/29
Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Phil Holmes, 2020/10/31
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/31
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Phil Holmes, 2020/10/31
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Phil Holmes, 2020/10/31
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/31
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/31