[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:17:59 +0100 (CET) |
>>> Add issue #3640 to this discussion. Accidentals, bar numbers, and
>>> (now) multi-measure rests are all impacted by the fact that \bar
>>> "|" does not create a new measure.
>>
>> Maybe the whole thing is primarily a documentation issue that could
>> be fixed with prominent warnings at appropriate places?
>
> The "Unmetered music" section in the manual already discusses issues
> with bar numbers, accidentals, and autobeaming. It might be helpful
> to mention the workaround of using \partial 1024 s1024 to force a
> new measure at the end of a cadenza.
Sounds reasonable – you have worked on this the most in the last time,
so if you suggest that we should follow you...
Werner
- cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Thomas Morley, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/14
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, David Kastrup, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, David Kastrup, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/17
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Thomas Morley, 2021/01/15
- Re: cadenza followed by a MMR is buggy, Dan Eble, 2021/01/15