[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \segno is an articulation?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: \segno is an articulation? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:38:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> writes:
> LilyPond currently has commands \segno, \coda, and \varcoda, which
> create articulations. I'm looking for encouragement and approval to
> repurpose \segno and \coda as section delimiters. If I don't get it,
> my new commands will have to be named something like \segnoSection and
> \codaSection.
>
> To use \segno and \coda, I would have to rename the existing commands,
> but I'm not sure what would make the most sense. \segnoArticulation,
> \codaArticulation, and \varcodaArticulation would get the job done,
> but the name of a technique would fit better with the rest of the
> articulations.
\segnoSign etc maybe? It makes at least the statement that it's only
the sign without function attached to it. \segnoMark could be
misinterpreted to work like a mark rather than an articulation.
--
David Kastrup