[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE_CONFIG
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE_CONFIG |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:48:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.40.1 |
Am Dienstag, dem 08.06.2021 um 16:55 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Particularly when compiling Guile-1.8.8 in a local tree (basically still
> the preferred way of creating a distribution), the state is "go figure
> it out on your own". It's not that the previous state was all that much
> better (it wasn't). But swapping one undocumented method for another
> (and doing so silently, without any phase where you'd get an error
> message and a proposal how to likely achieve the same goal in a
> different manner, [...]
There was a warning message along with the compatibility code you added
for more than a year, and it remains in stable/2.22 including releases.
IMHO having an error for this case is a very bad idea because it would
trigger whenever there is the variable GUILE_CONFIG set in the user's
environment.
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part