Re: SMuFL name mapping update

[Jean Abou Samra]

Le 13/06/2021 à 04:23, Owen Lamb a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a while, and I apologize. Evidently I'm not as good at 
> managing my own schedule as I thought I'd be.
>
> That said, I'd like to pick up where I left off, choosing once and for 
> all what LilyPond glyphnames (i.e. clefs.G) go with what SMuFL 
> glyphnames (i.e. gClef), so that, in the future, Emmentaler can become 
> properly SMuFL-compatible.
>
> Instead of an Excel sheet, I've prepared a somewhat janky GitHub Pages 
> site here: https://wolfgangsta.github.io/emmentaler-bravura/. It 
> includes my current opinions on what glyphs should match up where, and 
> indicates possibly contentious decisions.
>
> But most importantly, it displays the glyphs themselves, so anyone can 
> compare Lily's and SMuFL's de facto standard fonts at a glance, and at 
> the same scale. (I caught a couple of my own errors myself while 
> working on it!)
>
> I've put in the same four glyph sections I presented last time, with 
> many opinions revised. As I have time, I'll add the next few, et 
> cetera, until all 25 sections found in the LilyPond manual are 
> accounted for.
>
> So, please--if you're interested, if you'd rather not let some mistake 
> of mine make its way into our font--give it a look and tell me what 
> you think (even if you think it's all good).
>
> Sincerely,
> Owen Lamb
>
> P.S. I'd particularly appreciate the help of anyone who's had 
> experience with Stockhausen accidentals. But really--anyone and 
> everyone should give it a look! The more pairs of eyes, the better.

Hello Owen,

Glad to see your project moving forward.

So, I gave it a look, and my totally uneducated eye didn't find anything 
surprising. The only part that is less clear is accidentals, where I 
agree with Werner's conclusions.

Cheers,
Jean