[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Shortcut for \repeat unfold
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:17:21 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Lukas-Fabian Moser <> writes:

> But your special-character argument made me think: Maybe it would be
> possible to get rid of the * sign? Maybe I'm missing something, but
> isn't \{unsigned int} still "available" so one could do \16 d8 instead
> of \*16 d8 ? Of course, probably only David K. can say for sure what
> implications that would have for parasing/lexing.

Guitarists (among other string instrument players) would likely object
to losing string number specifications.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]