Re: Ancient repeat sign

[David Kastrup]

Dan Eble <dan@lyric.works> writes:

> https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/560909328587237881/
>
> The sections of this work seem to be separated with a kind of repeat sign.
>
>     A  :|||:  B  :|||:  C  :||:  D  :|:
>
> Q. Do I understand correctly that this is performed AAA BBB CCD?
>
> Q. Is this the most obvious way to code it?
>
>     {
>       \repeat volta 3 \A
>       \repeat volta 3 \B
>       \repeat volta 2 \C
>       \repeat volta 1 \D
>     }

It would be strange that \repeat volta 3 ... \alternative gets a
different starting repeat sign than \repeat volta 3 ...

What if you want the old repeat sign but alternatives?

-- 
David Kastrup