[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quotes around \consists argument?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Quotes around \consists argument? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:28:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
> Well, one reason is that this enables the documentation highlighter
> to highlight engraver names in a special color/style picked based on their
> nature of engravers (purple in HTML, italic bold in PDF), whereas
> between quotes they are just strings.
>
> I observed the same with Emacs, Vim and jEdit.
I find that there is a host of inconsistency not just with \consists.
It's also there with \name, \alias, \defaultchild and others. My gut
feeling for those is mostly "ugh" to see them without quote,
particularly \name : it seems somehow wrong to see stuff without quotes
that has not previously been defined.
On the other hand, we don't write
"variable" = 20
either.
--
David Kastrup
- Quotes around \consists argument?, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/04/24
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, David Kastrup, 2022/04/24
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/04/24
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, David Kastrup, 2022/04/24
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/04/24
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, Luca Fascione, 2022/04/25
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, David Kastrup, 2022/04/25
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, Luca Fascione, 2022/04/25
- Re: Quotes around \consists argument?, Luca Fascione, 2022/04/25