[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jan 2023 14:49:49 +0000 (UTC) |
> Let me add a combination here: Ghostscript 10.01.0 built from
> current git (commit 462efa959) yields 28MB with extractpdfmark and
> working links (AFAICT), without changes to LilyPond. The reason is
> likely
> http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;h=073c1adebeef38317ae0e6cb0f6d366ddaadb38a
> (the linked bug number is wrong, the correct one is
> https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705996 ).
This is good news, thanks!
> Which proves that extractpdfmark works with the new PDF interpreter
> (modulo bugs), and the size issue is unrelated (and still unfixed).
> QED.
Good to know that it is a different problem. I'll soon file a bug
report for GS regarding the size issue.
Werner
- Re: Missing items to make Cairo ready, (continued)
- Re: Missing items to make Cairo ready, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/01/04
- Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter (was: Missing items to make Cairo ready), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2023/01/05
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/01/05
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2023/01/05
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/01/06
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2023/01/06
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/01/10
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/01/10
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Karlin High, 2023/01/10
- Re: Ghostscript and new PDF interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/01/11