[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jul 2024 18:18:38 +0000 (UTC) |
> Werner the case you have on SE seems to indicate you need a
> translation invariant test, I think.
Whatever you say :-) Great that there are people on this list who can
actually contribute to the topic.
> In your case you could compute min diff over all possible
> translations that would bring your first test result to 0, while not
> appropriate for all test cases, it seems like this would be an ok
> thing to do for many of them (ImageMagick can't do this, I don't
> think)
Can you provide a demo?
Werner
- search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/27
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2024/07/27
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Luca Fascione, 2024/07/27
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Luca Fascione, 2024/07/27
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/27
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Luca Fascione, 2024/07/27
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Michael Käppler, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/29
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Luca Fascione, 2024/07/29
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2024/07/29
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/29
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2024/07/30
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Luca Fascione, 2024/07/30