[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:49:39 +0000 (UTC) |
>> I'm quite sure that behind the scene, for all GUIs, a metric gets
>> computed to decide whether there are differences at all. We 'just'
>> have to find one that fits our needs.
>
> It looks like you want a different property than an average metric,
> so perhaps what you have can be modified to add that.
Yes, this might be the solution to go: On top of the MAE algorithm we
currently use, another algorithm might increase the penalty for small
feature differences so that it is above our threshold.
Werner
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Thomas Morley, 2024/07/28
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Jürgen Reuter, 2024/07/27