[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jul 2024 20:27:07 +0200 |
> On 28 Jul 2024, at 19:49, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>>> I'm quite sure that behind the scene, for all GUIs, a metric gets
>>> computed to decide whether there are differences at all. We 'just'
>>> have to find one that fits our needs.
>>
>> It looks like you want a different property than an average metric,
>> so perhaps what you have can be modified to add that.
>
> Yes, this might be the solution to go: On top of the MAE algorithm we
> currently use, another algorithm might increase the penalty for small
> feature differences so that it is above our threshold.
It gets into the construction of image comparison algorithms. Perhaps using
some exponential for differences, or make another option for capturing
additions and removals.
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Thomas Morley, 2024/07/28
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/07/28
- Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Hans Åberg, 2024/07/28
Re: search for better regtest comparison algorithm, Jürgen Reuter, 2024/07/27