Re: Proposed context property renaming

[Trevor Bača]

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 1:02 PM David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:

> Trevor Bača <trevorbaca@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I am concerned by what seems to be an unwillingness to use the term
> > "duration" to label things in the system that are clearly durations.
>
> Computers are not fond of ambiguities.  I am concerned by what seems to
> be an unwillingness to use consistent terminology while expecting
> consistent results.
>

Hi David, is what's at stake here a desire to use the word "duration" to
mean just the LilyPond-specific construct that looks like ...

  4..
  16
  16.
  32..

... and so on?

Is that what's going on here?

-- 
Trevor Bača
www.trevorbaca.com
soundcloud.com/trevorbaca