[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming baseMoment
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming baseMoment |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:16:14 -0500 |
Hi Joram,
I was just coming back to say something similar… :)
What I said about “duration”
> When talking about the first musical event in that tuplet, noboty I know
> (including me!) would use the word “duration” to express the power-of-2 note
> value (eighth) or the number of augmentation dots (1) or the scaling factor
> or any combination thereof.
>
> When asked to describe the “duration” of that first note/event, I/they would
> almost certainly say something along the lines of “3/5s of a quarter note”.
is equally true of the word “length” [for most people/musicians I know].
It would be great to find a totally different word to attach to the visual
value/representation of a note.
> note value = length of a note in visible note representation =?= ly:duration
Unfortunately, Wikipedia says “a note value indicates the relative duration of
a note”, which highlights the ambiguity/confusion.
If (as I understand it to be) we’re differentiating between the musical
duration=length of a note/event versus its graphical representation, we should
see if we can stay away from anything remotely related to duration, and I fear
“value” falls under that rubric.
– Kieren
______________________________________________
My work day may look different than your work day. Please do not feel obligated
to read or respond to this email outside of your normal working hours.