[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:07:03 +0000 (UTC) |
>> I very much dislike that. We use different fonts (via different
>> indexing commands) to provide a clear distinction between concepts
>> and commands, and LilyPond's clean naming schemes for properties,
>> context, engravers, etc., should additionally help a user to find
>> the stuff he or she needs.
>
> Dickson’s History of the Theory of Numbers has two non-overlapping
> indices: an Author Index and a Subject Index. Having used that book
> — and referred to both indices — literally thousands of times in my
> life, I can honestly say that if they were in a single index,
> differentiated only by fonts, it would have been a far more
> frustrating experience.
You can't compare that, since in almost all cases you know *a priori*
whether to look up an author or something else. It thus makes sense
to have a separate index for authors not overlapping with the general
index (and the 'LaTeX companion' has such a separate index).
Werner
- NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/17
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Simon Albrecht, 2024/12/19
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/19
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Mats Bengtsson, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Simon Albrecht, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/20