[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing
From: |
Trevor Bača |
Subject: |
Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:24:32 -0500 |
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 3:59 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren@kierenmacmillan.info> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > I very much dislike that. We use different fonts (via different
> > indexing commands) to provide a clear distinction between concepts and
> > commands, and LilyPond's clean naming schemes for properties, context,
> > engravers, etc., should additionally help a user to find the stuff he
> > or she needs.
>
> Dickson’s History of the Theory of Numbers has two non-overlapping
> indices: an Author Index and a Subject Index. Having used that book — and
> referred to both indices — literally thousands of times in my life, I can
> honestly say that if they were in a single index, differentiated only by
> fonts, it would have been a far more frustrating experience.
>
Hey Kieren,
Do you ever use Appendix D? Or only ever Appendix E?
--
Trevor Bača
www.trevorbaca.com
soundcloud.com/trevorbaca
- NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/17
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Simon Albrecht, 2024/12/19
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/19
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Mats Bengtsson, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Werner LEMBERG, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Simon Albrecht, 2024/12/20
- Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing, Trevor Bača, 2024/12/20