lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: split-subbeam direction

 From: Spider Subject: Re: split-subbeam direction Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 10:21:37 -0700 (PDT)

```Yes, I don't get that either. That would mean for the first
half of my given measure (in bb.ly),

Lilypond gives this:

|  |  |  |
|  |  |  |
+--+--+--+
|--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|--+--+--+
|  |  |  |
|  |  |  |

but this is correct?

|  |  |  |
|  |  |  |
|---+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|---+--+--+  +--+--+--+
|   |  |  |
|   |  |  |

or this?

|  |  |  |
|  |  |  |
|---+--+--+  +--+--+--+
|---+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|   |  |  |
|   |  |  |

> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > We recently talked with Paul Roberts,  a notation guru
> that explained
> > to us that it should really be
> >
> >      |  |  |  |
> >  |----------------|--|--|
> >  |---|--|--|  |---|--|--|
> >  |                |  |  |
> >
> >
> > (the 1st stem determines the "direction" of the beam)
>
> I don't understand. Does this mean that
>
>
>     |  |
>     |  |
>     | -+
> +--+--+
> +-
> |
> |
>
>
> is incorrect and should be
>
>
>     |  |
>     |  |
> +--+--+
> +-   -+
> |
> |
>
>
> ?
>
> -Rune
>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com

```