[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Feb 2004 13:50:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Matthias Kilian writes:
> HEAD works fine for me. However, I just ran into the next problem (I
> hope that's a newbie error rather a bug):
>
> \version "2.1.15"
> \score {
> \notes \relative c {
> \time 1/4
> \key d \minor
> \clef bass
> << <cis a' cis>4 \\ {g'8. bes16} >>
> }
> \paper {}
> }
Does B&H arrange the heads in the same way as LilyPond? LilyPond only
tried to rearrange heads to avoid obscuring dots. I've made fix in
CVS.
> ps: may be that Busoni's transcription of Bach's d minor Chaconne is a
> good torture test for LilyPond.
Yes, hit me harder!
> I've two printouts of that tune (one from gdr, early 80's, one from
> brd, mid 90s), both of equally (bad) quality. If you're interested,
> I'll send an exemplar to you (or to Han-Wen). However, LilyPonding
> it seems to be non-trivial :-/
I'd rather look for a good engraving if we're going to use it to model
LilyPond. What about the B+H edition?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: missing dots with merge-differently-dotted,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=