Re: appoggiatura and clef woes

[Julien Salort]

Erik Sandberg <address@hidden> wrote:

> This could be considered a bug. You can, however, compare it to the following
> situation; and suddenly it's not so obvious what the expected behaviour would
> be:
>     \notes <<
>         \new Staff {
>             r1 \clef bass r2
>             }
>         \new Staff {
>             r1 \clef bass \time 2/4 \grace c16 c2
>             }
>     >>

I think this is different.
In that cas, there is actually something before the clef change. It is
therefore logical to repeat the clef.

In my case, there was nothing before the \clef keyword.
I, therefore, have no doubt that this should be considered a bug.

> In any case, there is a workaround for you: Try adding "\grace s16" before
> your r2:s. 

This solved the problem.
Thanks.

-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on a mailing list?