[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Time

From: Erik Sandberg
Subject: Re: Time
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:02:55 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

On Thursday 17 June 2004 04.09, Joshua Koo wrote:
> Wow, Amazing! Well I didnt expect you would really type up and time
> yourself. I was just waiting to get some approimate estimates.

Well, I just did it for fun.. I never actually benchmarked my typesetting, I 
also wanted to see how much time it actually takes.

> I definally 
> took much much much longer than you did, and means I would have to improve
> myself much more. Thanks for pointing out the possible mistakes. Bar 17:
> According to my score, it it correct. 
Then it probably is correct; i just suspected it wasn't since it looked 
inconsistent with the way it was done in some other places.
(but I'm not a cello player)

> So the dirty way was to use *2/3 when you didnt want triplets, and \times
> 2/3 when you needed the tripplets? Think I ask the question a while back
> here, but cant remember if it was answered. But anyway this is my method.
>  \override TupletBracket   #'number-visibility = ##f

Thanks.. I remembered it was something like this, so I grepped for "tuplet" 
everywhere.. but apparently I didn't grep -i.

> \header {
>        title = "Brandenberg Concerto No.5 (Keyboard Concencerto) Mvt 3"
>        composer = "J.S. Bach"
>        tagline = "address@hidden WIP for mutopia-project"
>        meter = "Allegro"

btw, I think this should be piece.. meter is for metronome markings, I think. 
I'm not sure though.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]