[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers)
From: |
Arvid Grøtting |
Subject: |
Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers) |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:50:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.2 (berkeley-unix) |
address@hidden writes:
> Musically [lyrics] are a part of one staff.
IMHO, in the general case they belong to a voice, not to a staff. In
some "special cases" (actually, in some very common cases), e.g. one
voice per staff or the same rythm in all voices on a staff, this is
equivalent to their being part of a staff. In the case of the same
rythm in all voices, they could even belong to the ChoirStaff context,
logically.
Other than that, I agree. I quite miss a stronger and more logical
binding between lyrics and music; after all, the lyrics *are* part of
the description of how vocal music is to be sung.
--
Arvid
- Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), Maurits Lamers, 2004/10/14
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), Ruud van Silfhout, 2004/10/17
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), Maurits Lamers, 2004/10/17
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), Maurits Lamers, 2004/10/21
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), Mats Bengtsson, 2004/10/21
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), maurits, 2004/10/21
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers),
Arvid Grøtting <=
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), Maurits Lamers, 2004/10/21
- Re: Little problem with lilypond (Modified by Maurits Lamers), David Raleigh Arnold, 2004/10/21
- Very minor problem with lilypond, Michiel Lange, 2004/10/21
- Re: Very minor problem with lilypond, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/10/21