Re: Font problems in 2.3.24

[Alexandre Beneteau]

Thanks for your reply,

I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns 
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa)

Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for 
graces notes and fermata on bar.

Anyway, I dug a little more and I can get good postscript and pdf files starting 
with the dvi produced by lily using :
dvips -f -Z flute.dvi > flute.ps

This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2004.10.30:1258' ->
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta20
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta26
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta26
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta13
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta13
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta14
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta14
<texc.pro><music-drawing-routines.ps><special.pro>. [1] [2] [3] [4]

As you can see, there are still problems (even after having deleted the font 
caches), but the output is correctly displayed by gv (?)

I'm still using Pedro's packages of lilypond-2.3.24...

Hoping this will help to track the problem,

Thanks,

        Alex.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and 
> > I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which 
> > contains the line
> >
> > mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000
> >
> >
> > Does this give any clues as to the problem?
>
>
> yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly.
> over here I have
>
>         byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa
>         /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa
>
> what does kpsewhich say?