[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Argument transfer?
From: |
Fairchild |
Subject: |
RE: Argument transfer? |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:34:11 -0500 |
Haven't used LSR much, but initial impression is that it good for browsing
but not reliable/maintained: see 'Caesura ("railtracks") with fermata' and
'Changing the appearance of a slur from solid to dotted or dashed'. Haven't
noted any \version information. It's not easy to search and things aren't
found with a search from http://lilypond.org/web/. Most entries are
elementary and are or should be included in the user manual.
Why not incorporate LSR into the manual or Tips and Tricks?
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Sandberg [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:47 AM
To: Fairchild
Cc: 'Nicolas Sceaux'; address@hidden;
address@hidden
Subject: Re: Argument transfer?
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 01.39, Fairchild wrote:
> About a month ago I started this thread with the question: " [I]s
> there a way to pass a parameter into a define from within \score?"
> Several of you responded with answers ranging from "impossible" to
> "certainly". Actually I was searching for a way to invoke the define
> with an argument, massage the argument with Scheme code, then use the
> results in Lily code within the define. Appended below are two
> equivalent solutions. I post them for several reasons:
>
> 1) As a way of thanking you who responded.
>
> 2) The documented examples found aren't very comprehensible -- maybe
> these can be made available -- with commentary.
You could always add it to the LSR
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/
Erik