[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ties in second endings
From: |
Peter Mogensen |
Subject: |
Re: Ties in second endings |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:53:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050831 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge2 |
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Peter Mogensen wrote:
>> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>> See
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-09/msg00444.html
>>> for the simple extra work-around that's needed.
>>
>> Yes... I did read your post.
>> And as I said in the answer, I've experienced that that solution causes
>> lilypond to give up breaking lines.
>
>
> It seems to be a bug in versions 2.4 and 2.6 that has been fixed in
> version 2.7. Otherwise, I would have asked you to send a separate
> bug report to bug-lilypond.
OK... I didn't know that.
>> I also don't like to have to repeat
>
>> a hack in all voices.
>> Thus, I prefer the solution I just posted.
>
>
> OK! One clear disadvantage is that the first real note of the second
> ending gets typeset too far to the right compared to the other
> parts.
Yes... but only very little, if you use "s64"
For my use this is better. I care about typesetting, but I care even
more about easily maintainable code because I often re-arrange and make
ad-hoc publications for courses.
So I'm willing to compromise a slight shift in one voice for not having
to duplicate hacks in all voices.
> Also, I didn't really see the point of using \grace{...},
> when you anyway were fiddling with the note durations, but when I
> tried it and compared to using
> \hideNotes a64~ \unHideNotes a4*15/16 s16.. g2.
> I noticed that you got a smaller displacement (since the spacing
> is smaller for grace notes) but also a correspondingly shorter
> tie.
Yes... you're right. The use of \grace is not necessary, but it makes a
smaller tie, which IMHO seems more correct.
Peter
- Re: Co-sponsoring Was: Ties in second endings, (continued)
- Re: Co-sponsoring Was: Ties in second endings, Erik Sandberg, 2005/09/23
- Re: Ties in second endings, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/09/23
- Re: Ties in second endings, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/09/23
- Re: Ties in second endings, Erik Sandberg, 2005/09/23
- top-line tempo text markings, D Josiah Boothby, 2005/09/22
- Re: top-line tempo text markings, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/09/23
- Re: Ties in second endings, Peter Mogensen, 2005/09/22
- Re: Ties in second endings, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/09/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Ties in second endings,
Peter Mogensen <=
- Re: Ties in second endings, Erik Sandberg, 2005/09/22
- Re: Ties in second endings, Peter Mogensen, 2005/09/22
- Re: Ties in second endings, Erik Sandberg, 2005/09/23
- Re: Ties in second endings, Peter Mogensen, 2005/09/23
- Re: Ties in second endings, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/09/22
- RE: Ties in second endings, Fairchild, 2005/09/22
Re: midi don't ties..., Mats Bengtsson, 2005/09/20
Re: midi don't ties..., Mats Bengtsson, 2005/09/20