[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?
From: |
David Feuer |
Subject: |
Re: What to use to edit output after the fact? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:14:48 -0400 |
On 4/17/06, Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> It's a well-known fact that Illustrator is unable to handle
> all features of the Postscript language, even though Adobe
> wrote the specs themselves.
> It's also a well-known fact that LilyPond uses some Postscript
> features that for example all but the latest versions of
> Ghostscript fail to handle correctly. However, I'm not sure
> how well it actually adheres to the Postscript standard.
I think the biggest compliance issues have to do with
1. DSC
2. Encapsulability
- What to use to edit output after the fact?, lilypond_user, 2006/04/17
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Kieren Richard MacMillan, 2006/04/17
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/04/17
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?,
David Feuer <=
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Kris Shaffer, 2006/04/17
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, andrea valle, 2006/04/18
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Kris Shaffer, 2006/04/18
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Walter Hofmeister, 2006/04/20
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, lilypond_user, 2006/04/21
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Josiah Boothby, 2006/04/21
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, John Hawkinson, 2006/04/21
- Re: What to use to edit output after the fact?, Eduardo Vieira, 2006/04/21