[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Evolutionary User Strategery
From: |
Fairchild |
Subject: |
RE: Evolutionary User Strategery |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:16:54 -0500 |
New scores could use new features and not have to work around the bugs of
earlier versions. Older scores that have been carefully tuned, compensating
for earlier bugs, would continue to produce the intended result without
having to be overhauled. There would be no need to maintain multiple
versions.
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Sandberg [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 3:55 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Evolutionary User Strategery
On Saturday 08 July 2006 18:58, Fairchild wrote:
> The 3.0 processor could note the 2.4 version flag and treat the ly
> file in the 2.4 way, maintaining upward compatibility without a need
> for convert-ly.
In what way would that be different from installing two different versions
of
lily? If you don't want the bugfixes from 3.0, why do you upgrade to 3.0?
--
Erik
- Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/07
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/07
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Trevor Bača, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/07/08
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/08
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/09
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery,
Fairchild <=
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/09
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/07/09
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/10
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/10
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Simon Dahlbacka, 2006/07/10
- RE: Evolutionary User Strategery, Fairchild, 2006/07/10
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/10
- Message not available
- Re: Evolutionary User Strategery, Erik Sandberg, 2006/07/12
Re: Evolutionary User Strategy - A Compromise, Colin Wilding, 2006/07/12