[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Opposite way (was: TextSpanner length?)
From: |
Jean-Charles |
Subject: |
Opposite way (was: TextSpanner length?) |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:43:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) |
Hi all,
As a matter of fact, and being quite a silly boy, I always try,
if I do want to _INCREASE_ something as the process deals with
_DECREASING_, to give the opposite instruction: so to say that
"LONGER" equals "LESS SHORTER"
Might be useful in many cases.
Jean-Charles
>
>Ahh, cunning. A negative amount of shortening didn't occur to me.
>
>Might I recommend that the documentation be changed from:
>
>The lengths to shorten a text-spanner on both sides, for example a
>pedal bracket
>
>to something like:
>
>The lengths to shorten a text-spanner on both sides, for example a
>pedal bracket, negative values lengthening the text-spanner.
>
>Cheers,
>Stewart
>
>>
>>From: "Kieren MacMillan"
>>
>> Look at #'shorten-pair in the text-spanner-interface.
>>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Opposite way (was: TextSpanner length?),
Jean-Charles <=