lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simple substitution for oddFooterMarkup?


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Simple substitution for oddFooterMarkup?
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:43:09 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909)



address@hidden wrote:
Hi --

Your macro definition:

 boldPageNumber = \markup { \fill-line { \bold \fontsize #3
 \on-the-fly #print-page-number-check-first \fromproperty
 #'page:page-number-string } }

Question:  if print-page-number-check-first is a defined function,
does it have to be referenced as a literal symbol
(by adding an apostrophe after the #)? --

      #'print-page-number-check-first
No, here you want to actually apply the function. If you add an apostrophe
(you "quote" it in Scheme terminology), you just get a symbol named
print-page-number-check-first.

See http://community.schemewiki.org/?howto-learn-scheme for more
information.

   /Mats




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]