[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Decrescendo on last note??
From: |
Steve Schow |
Subject: |
RE: Decrescendo on last note?? |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:46:00 -0700 |
Or actually the answer is to attach to spacers. Got it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Schow [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:42 PM
> To: 'Graham Percival'
> Cc: 'Dewdman42'; 'address@hidden'
> Subject: RE: Decrescendo on last note??
>
> To help anyone else who reads this thread in the future. The
> answer to my question is that the opening of the decrescendo
> does not have to be attached to a note.. Per the example,
> only the termination needs to be attached to a note.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Graham Percival [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:37 PM
> > To: Steve Schow
> > Cc: 'Dewdman42'; 'address@hidden'
> > Subject: Re: Decrescendo on last note??
> >
> > Steve Schow wrote:
> > > It says in the manual:
> > >
> > > "A crescendo mark is started with \< and terminated with
> > \! or an absolute dynamic. A
> > > decrescendo is started with \> and is also terminated with
> > \! or an absolute dynamic. \cr and
> > > \decr may be used instead of \< and \>."
> >
> > And the example directly underneath that sentence is this:
> >
> > c\< c\! d\> e\!
> > << f1 { s4 s4\< s4\! \> s4\! } >>
> >
> > Compare the example with the output.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Graham
> >
>